Google invests $75M in A24 to build AI filmmaking tools, starting with storyboards
The indie studio beloved by young, AI-skeptical audiences is partnering with Google DeepMind on a multiyear, nonexclusive deal spanning production, postproduction, and distribution — and it's already navigating a creative tension.
What matters
- Google is investing approximately $75 million in A24 — its first equity stake in a film studio — under a multiyear, nonexclusive DeepMind partnership covering production, postproduction, and distribution.
- The first tool in development at A24 Labs is an AI storyboard generator; A24 says the tools won't resemble prompted generative AI.
- The deal does not grant Google access to A24's film and TV library or content data for model training.
- DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis said the goal is to build tools that empower artists by working with them from day one.
- A24's audience and some filmmakers are notably AI-skeptical; Backrooms director Kane Parsons has called AI 'genuinely harmful.'
What happened
Google DeepMind is investing roughly $75 million in A24, the indie studio behind films like Everything Everywhere All At Once, Marty Supreme, and the blockbuster Backrooms. The deal, first reported by The Wall Street Journal and confirmed across multiple outlets, marks Google's first equity stake in a film studio.
The partnership is structured as a multiyear, nonexclusive research agreement. A24 filmmakers will get hands-on access to DeepMind's research infrastructure, while DeepMind receives real-time feedback from working directors as it builds new creative tools. The collaboration covers production, postproduction, and distribution.
The first project is already underway at A24 Labs: an AI tool to generate storyboards — the rough visual sketches directors use to plan scenes before cameras roll. An A24 representative told the WSJ that the tools "won't look anything like the prompted generative type of AI that people feel uncomfortable with."
Crucially, the deal does not grant Google access to A24's existing film and television library or its content data for model training. A24 is also not locked into using only Google's tools.
DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis framed the partnership as artist-first: "We believe the best way to develop tools that empower artists is to work directly with them. By collaborating with filmmakers and industry leaders like A24 from the beginning, we can build new AI features to support artists in authentic, meaningful storytelling that helps enable their creative vision."
Eli Collins, a vice president of product for DeepMind, added: "We believe breakthroughs happen when you get technology into the hands of the best minds in the field."
Why it matters
A24 occupies a unique cultural position: it's the studio that young, cinephile audiences trust precisely because it champions auteur-driven, unconventional filmmaking. That audience is also among the most AI-skeptical demographics in entertainment. The partnership therefore represents a high-stakes test of whether AI tools can be introduced into prestige creative workflows without alienating either filmmakers or fans.
The deal also signals a broader industry trend. TechCrunch notes that Netflix acquired Ben Affleck's AI tooling company Interpositive earlier this year, and Amazon has also been exploring AI in production. Google's move into A24 — a studio recently valued at roughly $3.5 billion following a prior funding round with Thrive — shows that major tech companies are now competing to embed themselves in Hollywood's creative pipeline, not just its distribution infrastructure.
The constraints A24 imposed are notable: no library access, no prompted generative output, nonexclusive terms. This suggests a deliberate effort to distance the partnership from the controversies that have dogged generative AI in entertainment, where concerns about training data, copyright, and job displacement have been acute.
What to watch
- Whether A24's filmmakers, including AI-critical voices like Kane Parsons, will actually adopt the storyboard tool or refuse to use it.
- Whether the partnership's scope stays limited to workflow assistance or eventually expands toward generative content in postproduction or distribution.
- How A24's young, AI-skeptical audience reacts to the brand's embrace of Google-backed AI — and whether it affects box office or subscription behavior.
- Whether Google's "first-of-its-kind" equity stake in a film studio prompts rival tech companies to pursue similar deals with other prestige studios.
What to do next
Developers
Study the storyboard-generation use case as a model for narrow, non-generative AI assistance in creative workflows — the constraints A24 imposed (no library access, no prompted generation) are a useful design template.
The deal signals that production-assistive AI tools that avoid full generative output may face less resistance than broad content-generation models.
Founders
Consider partnership structures that ring-fence IP access while delivering workflow value, as Google and A24 did — no library transfer, nonexclusive deal, tools built for the creative team's own use.
Creative-industry AI partnerships live or die on trust; limiting data and IP access reduces backlash risk and regulatory exposure.
PMs
If building AI tools for creative professionals, prioritize workflow-assistive features (storyboarding, scheduling, asset organization) over generative content creation in early releases.
A24's explicit framing — 'won't look anything like the prompted generative type of AI that people feel uncomfortable with' — reflects market demand for tools that augment rather than replace creatives.
Investors
Watch whether this partnership validates a 'narrow AI for creative workflows' category that can attract enterprise budgets without the reputational risk of generative-content backlash.
A $75M nonexclusive deal from Google into a prestige indie studio signals that large tech is willing to fund non-generative, production-pipeline AI — a segment that may be more defensible and less controversial.
Operators
If running a studio or production company, evaluate where AI-assisted storyboarding or pre-visualization could reduce pre-production costs without alienating creative talent.
Storyboarding is a well-scoped, high-cost pre-production step; AI assistance here is less politically charged than generative script or visual content, but talent relations still need careful management.
Testing notes
Caveats
- The AI storyboard tool is not publicly available; this is a partnership announcement, not a product release.
- No public API, beta, or waitlist was mentioned in the source reporting.
- The tools are intended for A24's filmmakers first; general availability is not confirmed.